513 Fm 1567, Lone Oak, Texas 75453, United States

This is a 64-acre rural parcel at 513 FM 1567 in Lone Oak, Hunt County, Texas — a roughly triangular tract sitting at the edge of a small East Texas town, about 10 miles from Lake Tawakoni. The land is open grassland across most of its area, with a dense broadleaf woodland block in the northern portion, a cluster of structures near the center of the parcel, and what appears to be a small stock pond near the center. County assessor data could not be retrieved, so ownership, assessed value, and tax figures are not available from that source. The two things that most define this parcel are its exceptional road access — nearly 3,000 ft of frontage on three public roads including US Highway 69 — and the flood and drainage constraints that affect roughly one fifth of the land.

On access and buildability, this parcel is unusually well-positioned. It fronts US Highway 69 (about 1,570 ft), FM 1567 (about 807 ft), and Hickory Street (about 411 ft), giving it direct public road access on multiple sides — a meaningful advantage in a county where road access is a legal requirement for subdivision and a practical requirement for development. The terrain is essentially flat, with slopes under 2 degrees across virtually the entire 64 acres, and every acre is technically within the slope threshold for construction. The combination of flat ground and multi-road frontage means access to usable land is straightforward, with no need to bridge or route around terrain obstacles.

The flood picture is mixed but manageable. About 81% of the parcel sits in the lowest-risk flood zone (FEMA Zone X), where federal law does not require flood insurance. The remaining 19% — roughly 12 acres — falls in a high-risk flood zone (Zone A) that carries a 1% annual chance of flooding; this strip runs diagonally through the northern portion of the parcel. Because the parcel does intersect this high-risk zone, federal law requires flood insurance on any federally-backed mortgage, and lenders will apply that requirement. No base flood elevation has been established for the Zone A portion, which means that if you build there, determining finished floor elevation for permitting purposes requires a more involved engineering analysis. The Zone A acreage coincides with the northern area where the Hopco silty clay soil — rated as frequently flooded — sits in the northeast corner, and where the small bottomland hardwood wetland patch is mapped. These three constraints (flood zone, frequently flooded soil, and wetland) stack in the same northern area and compound each other: that corner of the parcel is where development would face the most restrictions.

Wetlands cover about 2.3% of the parcel — roughly 1.5 acres spread across several small patches in the central and northeast areas. The types present (seasonally flooded channels, briefly flooded bottomland forest, and a small area of permanently submerged river bottom) place this parcel within the potential jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Any filling, grading, or construction that disturbs these wetland areas could require a federal permit before work begins. The coverage is relatively small, but the permit process can be time-consuming and is worth mapping carefully before planning any construction.

The soil picture reinforces the constraint pattern. The parcel has four soil types. Three of them — Crockett loam (covering about 57% of the parcel) and Leson clay (about 29%) — share the same critical limitation: all three carry the lowest possible rating for both building foundations and septic systems. Crockett is a clay-heavy, expansive soil prone to shrink-swell movement that can damage foundations and pipes; Leson is a similarly problematic clay. Neither is well-suited to conventional septic. The only exception is the Hopco silty clay in the northeast corner (about 14%), which is frequently flooded and carries the same poor ratings. In plain terms: on-site septic system design will require careful soil evaluation across the entire parcel, and any prospective buyer should have a licensed soil evaluator assess septic feasibility before closing. All four soil types rate excellent for grazing, which is consistent with the parcel's apparent long-term use as pasture.

Electric service is available in the area, with Trinity Valley Electric Cooperative identified as the likely provider for a line extension inquiry (reach them at 800-766-9576). A 345-kilovolt transmission line — a major bulk-power corridor owned by Oncor — runs about 1.6 miles to the southeast; this is a right-of-way and siting feature of the surrounding landscape, not a source of direct service. No public sewer appears to serve this location, and comparable nearby parcels confirmed as lacking public sewer have relied on aerobic septic systems — making Hunt County's septic permitting process a critical step before any development.

The parcel carries no designated or proposed critical habitat for any federally listed species, and no EPA cleanup sites, Superfund listings, or active toxic emitters appear within 5 miles. The City of Lone Oak's wastewater treatment plant sits about 0.7 miles to the south and carries an active compliance violation as of mid-2026; the nature and severity of that violation are not detailed in the data, and it warrants independent inquiry. A travel center and RV park with a routine stormwater permit sits about 1,000 ft to the south. Neither represents an acute risk to the parcel, but both are worth monitoring.

The Lone Oak Fire Department maps this parcel inside its response area, with Station 13 approximately 0.22 miles to the west in a straight line. The actual driving distance will be longer. The fire protection class that applies here — which directly affects homeowner insurance premiums — is not published for individual addresses and should be confirmed with the fire department or an insurance agent.

Web research turned up nearby land sales on FM 513 in the $320,000–$407,000 range for 25–37 acre parcels, and a 25-acre listing on FM 1567 itself asking $500,000. These are unverified comparable data points for a 64-acre parcel with substantially more road frontage, offered only as local context — not as a valuation.

Key strengths of this parcel are its exceptional multi-road frontage (nearly 3,000 ft on three public roads, including a US highway), its essentially flat terrain making the full 64 acres physically buildable by slope, and its location within a mapped fire response area with a station less than a quarter mile away. The main weaknesses are the poor soil suitability for foundations and septic across the entire parcel, the roughly 12-acre Zone A flood area in the north that stacks with wetland and frequently flooded soil to compound restrictions in that corner, and the absence of any assessor data, which means ownership, valuation, and tax burden cannot be confirmed from this analysis.

The county assessor record for this parcel could not be retrieved — ownership, assessed value, tax history, and building permits are unknown from that source. Zoning data is also unavailable for Hunt County in this analysis. Both gaps are material: a buyer should pull the assessor record directly from the Hunt County Appraisal District (hunt-cad.org) and verify zoning status with Hunt County before proceeding.